I second the motion. Peter
-- Peter Saint-Andre Jabber Software Foundation http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Thomas Muldowney wrote: > The only reason I can remember was to have on central place to look at, > but we quickly learned what a mess that is. I would say I'm in favor of > people dealing with it themselves. > > --temas > > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:00:24PM -0600, Joe Hildebrand wrote: > > In Exodus, we've implemented both the (relatively lightly documented) > > current way, as well as a simple HTTP HEAD. The HEAD approach seems to work > > pretty well... Can someone remind me of the reasons why the more complex > > protocol is necessary, since autoupdate is so similar to the HTTP caching > > problem? > > > > -- > > Joe Hildebrand > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:09 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [JDEV] autoupdate > > > > > > > > > Actually I was just about to ask someone for a JEP on that -- > > > we need a > > > real solution to the software update problem, not the current hacks. > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > -- > > > Peter Saint-Andre > > > Jabber Software Foundation > > > http://www.jabber.org/people/stpeter.php > > > > > > On Thu, 3 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > And no - we have no way to make the fix a mandatory > > > release. Are you > > > > > offering to fix update.yabber.org so that it actually works? > > > > > > > > Opps, make that update.jabber.org that is broken... > > > > > > > > Michael. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > jdev mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > jdev mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev > _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
