Mattias Campe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21-11-2002 14:30:32: > >- Would there be any reason why not supporting Jabber (because I >really don't see a reason at all, it's the only protocol next to irc >that they wouldn't have to reverse engineer)? A friend of me told me >that Microsoft actually notified Trillian that they would change their >protocol?? But of course, I don't know if that last one is true. > >- Wouldn't there be some hack to get Jabber into Trillian? I thought >the developers of Trillian were working on an API or sth. like that, >so that Jabber could be supported in Trillian.
You could try using the MSN2Jabber ( http://www.jabberstudio. org/projects/MSN2Jabber ) since you can have multiple MSN accounts running in Trillian. Don't know if it works and if it does.. it's very hacky ofcourse ;) I've looked once on their forum, and there was a sticky thread by an admin about wich features were on the TODO list, Jabber was on it as well (by request). So were a zillion other things. On MSN notifying trillian: that's a true story. MSN/Microsoft has nowhere near the parania about things like Jabber as for example AOL. In fact on an unofficial basis we've talked with them about it and they called it a "very intresting technology". I also believe Jabber inc. has a reasonably good relationship with them. (Jabber inc. also offers their own MSN transport) -- Tijl Houtbeckers Java/J2ME/GPRS Software Engineer @ Splendo The Netherlands _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.jabber.org/listinfo/jdev
