> Propably we need two top level protocols, one for 1-to-1 chat and one > for Conference chat. > we need to find a common ground.
Yup > why not come from the use case side? > > Media conferencing: > -> one to one > -> multi partner conference > > are these two use cases agreeable? i hope so. Yup > now we come to the next use cases: > > one to one > -> establish a session > -> ring partner > -> agree on a transmission approach with user > -> transmit data > -> leave a session > -> graceful session leave > -> shut down socket Yup > multi partner conferences > -> find a session (through browsing server) > -> create a session > -> leave a session > -> mute a user [please, not that p2p discussion on recieving and sending > 100 streams to/from multiple users] > -> kick a user > -> ban a user > -> etc. [see MUC use cases] Yup Now what we need to agree on is where these mechanisms overlap so we can reuse as much as possible between both of the use cases, so we can try to keep it as clean and simple as possible. Richard _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
