> We should not really even consider (1) because escapsulating the voice > data > and sending it via the jabber server just wont really work for voice chat > as > that would produce serious latence that would make it virtually unusable, > but instead of that the better solution for server based mechanisms is to > have a third party server for relaying the voice data, like we have a > separate server for MUC. The only problem with this tho of course is that > not every server operator will deploy such servers due to the bandwidth > demands and such, and those that do might well charge for the facility, so > IMO having at least the option of doing voice data p2p is pretty much a > requirement, not just doing it all server based no matter what as has been > suggested by others in the past.
Not only that, the solutions for such things already exist. I believe, as an example, that the Open H.323 project has a MUC, IVR, etc. _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
