On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 09:30:54AM -0600, Matthew A. Miller wrote: > From what I've seen so far, here are the possible paths I see we can > follow to resolve this: > 1) Lobby Macromedia to provide better support for XMPP
They seem to have thrown their lot in with AOL, but I think that long-term this would be the best approach. > 2) Lobby the jabberd2 project to provide better support for Flash Further hack propagation is sub-optimal. > 3) Develop alternatives to direct XMPP streams Let's see if we can make JEP-0124 do the right thing. > For Option #3, I believe there is already something in the works, in the > form of JEP-0124: HTTP Binding. It's not ideal, but given the fact that > it can much more easily accomodate the demands from both XMPP and > Flash. The problem, of course, is that JEP-0124 is still rather > immature, and lacks any truly deployable implementations. Well, it's a fairly new JEP. I know of several folks working on implementations, but not all of them will be open-source. > Then again, > if the Flash-XMPP/Jabber community does not feel this is adequate, they > are welcome to present better alternatives. As always. :-) /psa _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
