On Saturday 04 September 2004 5:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So I'd really like to have some quick, simple, and backwards/ > upwards-compatible solution which James' proposal seems to be. For now.
The problem is that it is still something to be replaced later. It's bad enough that we have existing protocols that we wish to supercede all the time, but do we really want to create protocols with the intent of replacing them? Let's do it right the first time, please. If the idea is that we will do it right and wrong simultaneously, by creating a JEP of the "right" way, and bypassing the JSF standards procedure with the "wrong" way, then I'll just wait for the JEP. And why is this thread on jdev anyway? It should be on standards-jig. -Justin _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
