В сообщении от 16 Сентябрь 2004 19:37 Remko Troncon написал(a): > > But I get your point. The idea of being able to load the plugins "as-is" > > is exactly what I would try to achieve. That way, all the effort goes > > into building the transport once... > > I personally like the approach PyMSN-t is taking: write a modular > transport (adaptable to other protocols) in Python, use the protocol > implementation of Twisted for the protocol specific things. I personally > have more trust in Python implementations than in the Gaim C libraries. > They're probably a bit more (easier) portable too. > > That's why it would be cool if protocol-specific effort went into > Twisted, and that other transports also base themselves on the PyMSN-t > framework for building transports. Well, the answer is obviously standard - do it :) The "gaim transport" is already exists so it gives us a great benefits: 1) we have one more _working_ implementation 2) if we will decide to go python+twisted way we have more time for implementation 3) freedom to choose from.
Personally I waiting for publication of this piece of code under free license to take a look at it [ and modify for my needs ]. -- Respectfully Alexey Nezhdanov _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://jabberstudio.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
