On 4/29/05, Francesco Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Remko, > Even if P2P IM could be interesting, it is something different than XMPP > (according with current specifications, it is basically a client server > protocol; of course everything can be changed). > My opinion is that, more than adding another connection mechanism, it > would be better to improve the services built on it (that is what can > make an xmpp/jabber solution really appealing).
I think it would be interesting to just have a best practices JEP that would explain how a Jabber /client/ could implement Zeroconf IM or server discovery. We're not talking about changing the XMPP protocol at all. -- Psi webmaster (http://psi-im.org) im:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://halr9000.com _______________________________________________ jdev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
