hi Roel,
your XML looks correct to me. I looks like there is a routing problem in
the server. Did you try your clients with another public server?
Regards
Alex
Roel Spruit schrieb:
This is the xml from both client1 and client2, I censured all jids and
stuff.
CLIENT1:
SENT: <message xmlns="jabber:client" to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client2
<http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client2>"
type="chat"><body>sometext</body><thread>blah</thread></message>
CLIENT2
RECV: <message to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client2 <http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client2>"
type="chat" from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client1"
<http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client1">><body>sometext</body><thread>blah</thread></message>
SENT: <message id="jcl_9" to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client1
<http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client1>"
type="chat"><thread>blah</thread><body>heyyy</body><x
xmlns="jabber:x:event"><composing/></x></message>
RECV: <message id="jcl_9" to="[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client1
<http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client1>" type="chat" from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client2"
<http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/client2">><thread>blah</thread><body>somereply</body><x
xmlns="jabber:x:event"><composing/></x></message>
We are using the Jive jabber server
Thanks in advance!
Roel
On 11/10/05, *Matthias Wimmer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
Hi Roel!
I propose you send us a dump of the messages, so we can check why it is
routed that we. It might also be interesting which server software you
are using, in case that there is a bug in the server.
Tot kijk
Matthias
Roel Spruit schrieb:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'm developing a limited xmpp client that is meant to communicate
with
> another
> xmpp client...that I'm also building (yeah, busy busy). These two
> clients will
> be logged on at the same jabber server, under the same name, but each
> under
> a different resource.
>
> My problem: I can send a message from client1 to client2, and it
> arrives as expected,
> with the client1 resourcename as the sender. However, when I reply to
> this message,
> the reply ALSO arrives at client2, and not at client1.
>
> I figured this was a priority problem, but it doesn't seem to be,
with
> client1 at the maximum
> priority it still fails.
>
> Can anybody help me with this problem?
>
> Regards,
>
> Roel Spruit
