The question is how many projects are interested in using jabber studio for project code hosting?
Artur On Tuesday 13 March 2007 16:44, Nahuel ANGELINETTI wrote: > Le Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:27:20 -0600, > > Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a �crit : > > Nahuel ANGELINETTI wrote: > > > can we know why this server is shutted down ? > > > > 1. The JabberStudio code base is unmaintained and no one has > > volunteered to maintain it. > > So why not can i propose my competences ? > > > 2. JabberStudio uses a lot of bandwidth (probably 90% of the > > bandwidth used by the XSF infrastructure) and our hosting provider is > > unhappy. > > In france we have hosters like dedibox which provide 100Mbps connection > ( without limit of transfered datas ), with a server 2GHz, 1GB of > DDRAM, and 160 GB of hdd, for only 59$ by month ( i'm not doing an > advertissment, just information ), and the possibility to have RAID > system. > > > 3. We have continued to have trouble with JabberStudio, first the > > rootkit 2 years ago and yesterday what was effectively a DOS (no I'm > > not going to discuss the details). > > ( point 2 ) > > > 4. The admin (c'est moi) doesn't have time for all this fun. > > I think i can have. > > > 5. There are plenty of great options out there (Google Code Hosting, > > Berlios, SourceForge, etc.) that provide dedicated project hosting, > > better bug tracking tools, and so on. Go use 'em. > > Sourceforge, i think it's a company who host/develop it, and not open > source, too bad, like Google Code Hosting. > > Regards, -- Artur Hefczyc http://www.tigase.org/ http://wttools.sf.net/
