Travis Shirk wrote: > On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:24 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > >> Indeed, it's not 100% clear that we need *any* stream re-openings, and >> that's something we might want to put into rfc3920bis for improved >> efficiency during stream negotiation. Or at least discuss. > > I agree that reopening the stream is just syntactic sugar since it > really enforces nothing, but maybe a better option would be that the new > list of features is sent after each one is negotiated?
Well sure, that's how it's supposed to work right now. Is some software not doing that? Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
