On Wed, 2008-03-05 at 09:41 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Travis Shirk wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-03-03 at 16:24 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > > >> Indeed, it's not 100% clear that we need *any* stream re-openings, and > >> that's something we might want to put into rfc3920bis for improved > >> efficiency during stream negotiation. Or at least discuss. > > > > I agree that reopening the stream is just syntactic sugar since it > > really enforces nothing, but maybe a better option would be that the new > > list of features is sent after each one is negotiated? > > Well sure, that's how it's supposed to work right now. Is some software > not doing that?
Against jabber.org... I see no new set of stream:features after the resource bind or the session start, currently the only two features which do not require reopening the stream, AFAIK. -travis
