On 05/04/2008 11:35 AM, Maciek Niedzielski wrote: > Remko Tronçon pisze: >>> 1. Modify existing documentation and implementations to a more strict >>> behavior that would treat values not mentionned in RFC 3921 as illegal. >> >> most implementations just ignore an unknown type and treat it as >> 'available', which i think is a sensible thing to do. > > On the other hand, ignoring undefined type 'invisible' and treating it > as normal available presence may be considered evil by some people.
Which is why we need to define a real protocol for invisibility. Here is a candidate: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0186.html Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
