Dnia 2008-05-05, pon o godzinie 07:35 -0600, Peter Saint-Andre pisze: > >> http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0186.html > > > > I prefer: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0126.html > > Or something. :) > > Let's get consensus on an approach that works so we can stop talking > about <presence type='invisible'/> because that monstrosity will never > be standardized.
If XEP-0018 (Invisible Presence) is such a monstrosity, why do you propose XEP-0186? These are after all nearly the same. The only difference is the switch that turns the invisible mode (IQ instead of PRESENCE). It requires the same as XEP-0018 (or even more) special casing in presence handling and is similarly horrid to implement. -- /\_./o__ Tomasz Sterna (/^/(_^^' http://www.xiaoka.com/ ._.(_.)_ im:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
