On 05/10/2008 3:40 AM, Andreas Monitzer wrote: > On May 10, 2008, at 00:25, Tomasz Sterna wrote: >> But backing to the topic... >> Did you have any time to look at my proposal of layered privacy lists? >> This could serve as a base for an easier for clients XEP-0126 >> replacement. > > Yes, right now for implementing XEP-0126, you have to do some AI magic > to get it to work, when you assume that the user might have set up a > privacy list that has to be honored even when the user is invisible > (which is a valid assumption). That was a no-go for me when I looked at > implementing it for Adium.
Right. That's why I think XEP-0186 is a very useful shortcut around the madness of invisibility based on privacy lists (even if in some server implementations the two might use the same backend). Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
