Am 10.12.2008 um 20:11 schrieb Dirk Meyer:
Great. A question to day 2: I guess the priority will be on "XMPP as Skype replacement", so RTP over Jingle, ICE-UDP and friends. But we should also have a discussion about the future of Jingle for TCP-likerequirements like file-transfer and e2e streams (see day 3). So ICE- TCPor something like this comes to my mind. I never was on an XMPP summit before, but maybe split the Jingle discussion into three parts: Jingle basics, UDP (VoIP), and TCP (ICE-TCP, TURN, etc).
Well, actually, UDP for file transfers can be desirable if you want to circumvent NAT. :) So UDP can work where TCP doesn't. Of course, you then need integrity checks.
And one note to file transfer on day 3: are there any ideas to supportseeking in file transfers? It would be a nice feature and I already havesome ideas. Maybe we can discuss it, too.
Streaming audio/video where you can seek? :)Maybe this should be implemented in Jingle Audio/Video and not in Jingle File Transfers. But OTOH, seeking in File Transfers would allow something like XMPPFS :). If you are just thinking about resuming: That's already possible, even with the old SI transfers.
-- Jonathan
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________
