Dnia 2009-01-14, śro o godzinie 10:20 +0100, Richard Smith pisze: > What I'm pondering is while the following is valid XML, is it valid > under XMPP? > > <message > to="..." > from="..." > xmlns:magicNS="urn:blah:etc" > magicNS:attr1="..." >... > > >From what I understand in RFC3920 this would be ok, however mildly > confusing > etc. > > Am I right in thinking that while this is valid, it's generally not > good for > client understanding? Not that I care much in this context anyway > since I'm > using XMPP as a transport protocol for something non-IM based, but > it's > always good to know :)
It is valid. Historically (in pre-XMPP jabber network) most clients did not support xmlns. This is why there are some strange restrictions applied on XMPP streams. But todays XMPP requires full xml namespace support, and IIRC GTalk uses them extensively, so sooner or later all servers and clients would support xmlns correctly. -- _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list FAQ: http://www.jabber.org/discussion-lists/jdev-faq Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
