On 3/3/09 9:26 PM, Brett Zamir wrote: > Namespaced attributes are, imo, just too tempting to avoid using. > Although it may go against the spirit of full present-day > interoperability, I think implementations not supporting real > namespacing are going against the spirit of XML--which is of course the > /extensible /markup language--and should be the ones forced to adapt.
Tempting for whom? Do you have a use case for this or are you simply musing about the beautiful possibilities of namespaced attributes? Naturally, feel free to submit patches and bug reports to your favorite xmpp code projects on to enable support for namespaced attributes. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
