On 7/12/10 1:58 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Mon Jul 12 19:43:00 2010, Bill de hÓra wrote: >> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:03 +0100, Dave Cridland wrote: >> >> A well defined mobile XMPP profile seems like a good idea, instead of >> grab bagging various XEPs and trying them out. Once there was an optimal >> mobile profile, whether or not XML makes sense would be much clearer. > > From a mobile client implementor's perspective yes. > > From a protocol designer's perspective, it's horrible - a Big Switch is > very hard to specify, and often ends up including the kitchen sink. > > This in turn means it's a nightmare for server implementors. > > I'd be interested in seeing a mobile XMPP specification which - like the > Lemonade one for email - simply points to a handful of specifications > and how to use them effectively, as well as providing useful background. > I have some of this written already, so I'll submit it as-is, and work > on improving it.
It seems that you did so... :) http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/mobile.html _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
