On 08/27/2010 05:18 PM, Matthew Wild wrote: > Do you have a better solution that doesn't have the issues your > implementation has? All we want are working specifications, and that's > what we're aiming to develop. > > The only cries I've heard that PEP doesn't scale seem to be coming > from folk involved in ejabberd. I'm not sure why that is.
To be fair, Stephen Pendleton claimed earlier in this thread there is a memory leak in Openfire. Jonathan Schleifer claimed that PEP is not supported in jabberd1 and jabberd2, the latter still seems to be maintained? I don't think the current tone is bringing us anywhere, in any case. greetings, Mati -- I only read plain text mail! I prefer pgp|gpg signed & encrypted mails!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
