29 aug 2013 kl. 03:27 skrev Peter Saint-Andre <stpe...@stpeter.im>:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 8/28/13 12:42 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>> 
>> 28 aug 2013 kl. 18:33 skrev Peter Saint-Andre
>> <stpe...@stpeter.im>:
>> 
>>> DANE/DNSSEC is great for that, or will be when it is more
>>> generally available, but IMHO we might need to wait *years* for 
>>> that to happen.
>> 
>> Peter, If you keep repeating this statement it will become true...
> 
> I don't think stpeter is that powerful. ;-)
;-) 
> 
>> I don't think we're talking so many years here, but it all depends
>> on which TLD you're using. In Sweden we've had DNSsec support in
>> .SE for many years, we have patches for OpenSSL for DANE and are
>> starting to look at code.
> 
> And our friends in .jp don't even have DNS SRV support yet!
Please explain.
> 
>> I think you should modify this statement that one might need to
>> wait years for DANE/DNSsec to be implemented in all TLDs.
> 
> It's not just the registrars -- it's the resolvers, the nameservers,
> the operating systems, the application software, the clients, the
> servers, the distros, etc. There are a lot of moving parts involved.
Well, when OpenSSL has this by default and a new release of Linux
is released with that version of OpenSSL a lot of apps will support
this automagically. And a few more people understanding then SSL proxy
- what it is and does - things will move fast.

But I do acknowledge that things take time. That should not stop
us early movers and shakers from pushing forward...
> 
> Just my centigram of silver. ;-)
Oh dear, that's metric!

/O
> 
> Peter
> 
> - -- 
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
> Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSHqN2AAoJEOoGpJErxa2p8qgQAJDb9+irrLk2s56xXSp0ZoW9
> o/IxgeBQNu6m3Ov0fKvuA8KBVUBBdyJw+b1m0+xQDguhrKz0RQQFva7lV91g1uq/
> WDq5cQnKufX8lR4KXIiEZ0qaH7fh7P9LWMZSICTRMvb60DaAsFZEmUL79Y9sP/KS
> 4YpyihVKuQ+e8s7bA9l4TY9jbZh4UUoEtRkeKVh8NJlqG2LHItIV7M9y/gseXyBQ
> 6CNYn1r48h8YzJATcdE7sZqBwjj2S8tU0tHnA92IWBvKPKF9cBGJqXl11kPqF+7C
> x2qzBqIkAmsONOqLB/XiAKRNM65qG1/tV1ZNWA5njD9aMdj63AadB2/gUrqZMjiT
> fInZju3GJidqX8/m0mF/DpmGAymxRDTEBeFf1qCX4BPrDYtcTJHJkRv63erTnhsl
> 3h4oh8TCPks1N01y2YfwzeK1zfUitqEH4E6oFcXrZdIwO2u40eYsjpQnLU/spnUs
> N9zZ27w/26CxEAuI/rtK3xToDA93S71gLs/AJJlv/KF6x+Z4EUwAS1qxhuYDA/k0
> DKNo0G9/YBHMgoPbK0YDS20bW/ehO1zEnHtXW337OzCv855JJ2OIJ6HEDwgfxaii
> HziOzfj77OQy7zMieLRURCNaIsOa6Fgutv/Jq2Ylf26yiNwDxL0tzM4XbHnieW5j
> 50V2cfdC3lZi4z2BN/l6
> =toIw
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
JDev mailing list
Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev
Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to