@Jonas, we target such a range of platforms this who area must be 'C' and work with some pretty archaic compilers… But using the compile-time constants would make everything a lot more readable and maintainable. Great idea…
Mat On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Jonas Wielicki <[email protected]>wrote: > On 05.12.2013 09:54, Dave Cridland wrote: > > That's a neat idea - I was intending to add in attribute hashing in order > > to handle the well-formedness constraints (and also optimize attribute > > searches in general), but I'd not thought about compile-time > precalculation > > of hashes, that's terribly clever, and an idea I'll shamelessly steal. > > FWIW, I was also going to build a simplistic single-hash Bloom on parse > to > > elide some searches, too. > > That just calls for C++11 compile-time constant expressions. If you ask me. > > _______________________________________________ > JDev mailing list > Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > -- Mat Henshall Founder and CEO, Square Connect, Inc. San Jose, CA www.squareconnect.com cell: 650.814.7585
_______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: [email protected] _______________________________________________
