On 8/26/11 12:05 AM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote: > On 08:13 Mon 22 Aug , Kelly O'Hair wrote: >> >> Oh wait a minute, please check with Weijun Wang (I will CC) on 6815182. >> I'm not seeing any record that this one was fixed in any jdk6 update, it may >> not apply to it >> but it is important that the fixes in openjdk6 are also in the jdk6 updates >> when it makes sense. >> > > This has never been the policy before, to my knowledge. Why should the > proprietary JDK6, > over which we have no control, be a blocker on bugs for OpenJDK6? For one > thing, there > are significant differences in the code bases, as far as I'm aware.
There may be some good reason why the fix wasn't applied to closed6. Or there may not be. It's hard to tell without asking first. cheers, dalibor topic -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador Phone: +494023646738 <tel:+494023646738> | Mobile: +491772664192 <tel:+491772664192> Oracle Java Platform Group ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603 Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz, Marcel van de Molen, Alexander van der Ven Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
