* Edvard Wendelin: > As you are aware there has been some issues with building openjdk 7u4 > in the last couple of weeks. This has been fixed in jkd7u2, but hasn't > been synced to jdk7u yet.
I don't know what 7u4 is, I assume it's the jdk7u/jdk7u forest. jdk7u2/jaxws doesn't built either (see my previous message), so I'm not sure if the issue at hand is merely lack of synchronization. It's really difficult to find a JDK 7 forest which builds and receives (security) updates. > My proposal going forward is that the developer submitting the fix for > a stabilisation forest is also responsible for pushing it to > jdk7u/jdk7u. An approval for the stabilisation forest would also > include jdk7u. If the code line has diverged and the fix is not > applicable, there needs to be a separate request for approval > according to the normal process [1]. It's not clear to me what "applicable" means in this context. Does it encompass just a clean Mercurial merge, or do you intend to include minor tweaks to essentially the same change as well? -- Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
