Hi,
On Nov 4, 2011, at 7:12 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Edvard Wendelin: > >> As you are aware there has been some issues with building openjdk 7u4 >> in the last couple of weeks. This has been fixed in jkd7u2, but hasn't >> been synced to jdk7u yet. > > I don't know what 7u4 is, I assume it's the jdk7u/jdk7u forest. Correct > jdk7u2/jaxws doesn't built either (see my previous message), so I'm not > sure if the issue at hand is merely lack of synchronization. It's > really difficult to find a JDK 7 forest which builds and receives > (security) updates. The bundle is missing on the server. AFAIK we haven't changed the properties file for 5 months, so someone must have accidentally removed the bundle. I'm looking into the problem and hopefully we can have it resolved soon. Cheers, Edvard > >> My proposal going forward is that the developer submitting the fix for >> a stabilisation forest is also responsible for pushing it to >> jdk7u/jdk7u. An approval for the stabilisation forest would also >> include jdk7u. If the code line has diverged and the fix is not >> applicable, there needs to be a separate request for approval >> according to the normal process [1]. > > It's not clear to me what "applicable" means in this context. Does it > encompass just a clean Mercurial merge, or do you intend to include > minor tweaks to essentially the same change as well? > > -- > Florian Weimer <fwei...@bfk.de> > BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ > Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 > D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
