one approval request for these 3 related issues should be fine.
Approved for jdk7u-dev. I've created bug records for all and will update
when I see your pushes. As Alan said, 3 changesets will be best and I
think that's your intention already.
cc'ing the original jdk8 reviewers here also as an FYI.
regards,
Sean.
On 03/09/2012 09:28, Jonathan Lu wrote:
On 09/03/2012 04:20 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 03/09/2012 09:09, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi all,
Here's a request of porting the fix 7152519, 7159041, 7153343 to
JDK7, could you please help to review?
All the three patches serves for the same purpose of removing
including of non-POSIX header link.h, so I suggest to contribute
them in one commit.
I don't know if there is an agreed policy on this but I think it
would be better to just hg export/import the individual change-sets,
otherwise it can be confusing when comparing the history or doing bug
archeology.
-Alan
Hi Alan,
Sorry for the confusion, I think you are right, here I'm posting the
independent 3 change sets, BTW, is it appropriate to raise one back
port request for these three changes?
7152519: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/604067ec3ced
7159041: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/9383a3749940
7153343: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/c4e66dc3222d
Thanks & best regards
Jonathan
