Now pushed to jdk7u-dev/jdk [1] [2] [3]. Regards, Neil
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/f8acc3222383 [2] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/aa04907cb729 [3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/257dee3bea4e On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 11:53 +0100, Seán Coffey wrote: > one approval request for these 3 related issues should be fine. > Approved for jdk7u-dev. I've created bug records for all and will update > when I see your pushes. As Alan said, 3 changesets will be best and I > think that's your intention already. > > cc'ing the original jdk8 reviewers here also as an FYI. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 03/09/2012 09:28, Jonathan Lu wrote: > > On 09/03/2012 04:20 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: > >> On 03/09/2012 09:09, Jonathan Lu wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Here's a request of porting the fix 7152519, 7159041, 7153343 to > >>> JDK7, could you please help to review? > >>> > >>> All the three patches serves for the same purpose of removing > >>> including of non-POSIX header link.h, so I suggest to contribute > >>> them in one commit. > >> I don't know if there is an agreed policy on this but I think it > >> would be better to just hg export/import the individual change-sets, > >> otherwise it can be confusing when comparing the history or doing bug > >> archeology. > >> > >> -Alan > >> > > Hi Alan, > > > > Sorry for the confusion, I think you are right, here I'm posting the > > independent 3 change sets, BTW, is it appropriate to raise one back > > port request for these three changes? > > > > 7152519: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/604067ec3ced > > 7159041: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/9383a3749940 > > 7153343: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/c4e66dc3222d > > > > Thanks & best regards > > Jonathan > > > > > -- Unless stated above: IBM email: neil_richards at uk.ibm.com IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
