Thank you ! On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Seán Coffey <[email protected]> wrote:
> Good point on it having to be a race condition. OK - sounds reasonable for > backport then. > > Sean - I've created a bug record for you. Will update when I see your push. > > regards, > Sean. > > > On 03/09/2012 12:16, David Holmes wrote: > >> On 3/09/2012 9:08 PM, Seán Coffey wrote: >> >>> Behavior mismatch between AbstractCollection.toArray(T[] ) and its spec >>>> >>> Is such a correction in an update allowed now ? Even if it is a >>> correction to original (released) behaviour ? This may be harmless but >>> I'm checking to be sure. >>> >>> David, Mike, Sean - what are your thoughts here ? Does this need further >>> discussion with conformance/compatibility engineers ? >>> >> >> I don't have an issue with it. I can't imagine anyone relying on it >> working the way it had been as the whole thing depends on a race condition >> anyway. >> >> David >> >> regards, >>> Sean. >>> >>> On 03/09/2012 09:54, Sean Chou wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Here is a request for porting fix 7121314 back to JDK7, could you please >>>> help review? >>>> >>>> Bug is: >>>> http://bugs.sun.com/**bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_**id=7121314<http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7121314> >>>> >>>> Changeset is: >>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/**jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/e06ea0dd9207<http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/e06ea0dd9207> >>>> >>>> Thread where it was reviewed: >>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/**pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-** >>>> March/009561.html<http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-March/009561.html> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> > -- Best Regards, Sean Chou
