Now pushed to jdk7u-dev/jdk [1]. Regards, Neil
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/09b0d78dfde9 On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 13:04 +0100, Seán Coffey wrote: > Good point on it having to be a race condition. OK - sounds reasonable > for backport then. > > Sean - I've created a bug record for you. Will update when I see your push. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 03/09/2012 12:16, David Holmes wrote: > > On 3/09/2012 9:08 PM, Seán Coffey wrote: > >>> Behavior mismatch between AbstractCollection.toArray(T[] ) and its spec > >> Is such a correction in an update allowed now ? Even if it is a > >> correction to original (released) behaviour ? This may be harmless but > >> I'm checking to be sure. > >> > >> David, Mike, Sean - what are your thoughts here ? Does this need further > >> discussion with conformance/compatibility engineers ? > > > > I don't have an issue with it. I can't imagine anyone relying on it > > working the way it had been as the whole thing depends on a race > > condition anyway. > > > > David > > > >> regards, > >> Sean. > >> > >> On 03/09/2012 09:54, Sean Chou wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> Here is a request for porting fix 7121314 back to JDK7, could you > >>> please > >>> help review? > >>> > >>> Bug is: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7121314 > >>> > >>> Changeset is: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/e06ea0dd9207 > >>> > >>> Thread where it was reviewed: > >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-March/009561.html > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > -- Unless stated above: IBM email: neil_richards at uk.ibm.com IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
