----- Original Message ----- > Alan has indicated that he's ok with this fix going into jdk7u. > You're > free to push to jdk7u-dev.
Done: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/c241d4a80272 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/fc52d0a1fcda Thanks. > > Regards, > Sean. > > On 24/09/2012 14:24, Andrew Hughes wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> On 19/09/2012 20:01, Seán Coffey wrote: > >>> On 19/09/2012 18:22, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >>>> Sure, http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/zlib/webrev.01/ is the > >>>> combined webrev. > >>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/jdk8/jdk/rev/35e024c6a62c is the > >>>> original > >>>> jdk8 changeset for 7110151. > >>> Thanks - let's get approval from Alan/Sherman then. I think > >>> Sherman > >>> may be OOTO at the moment. Once they're ok, I'll log a request > >>> for > >>> you > >>> to integrate into 7u10 forests (once available). > >> Yes, Sherman is away this week. I looked through Andrew's combined > >> webrev and it looks good to me. To my knowledge, we haven't had > >> any > >> issues with these changes in jdk8. It seems a fine change to get > >> into > >> jdk7u. > >> > > Are we still waiting for Sherman on this, or can I push? > > > >> -Alan > >> > > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
