Now pushed to jdk7u-dev/jdk [1]. Regards, Neil
[1] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/jdk7u-dev/jdk/rev/f7d9ab7563b5 On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 14:40 -0700, Seán Coffey wrote: > Neil, > > I don't see a problem with this being ported to jdk7u. I've checked the > bug report again and don't see any associated issues with this fix. > Approved. > > regards, > Sean. > > On 16/10/2012 10:36, Neil Richards wrote: > > Hi Sean, > > Am I now good to proceed to act on this approval, or is more discussion > > still needed to reach consensus on the merits of this backport ? > > > > Regards, > > Neil > > > > On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 18:39 +0100, Seán Coffey wrote: > >> Approved for jdk7u-dev. Note that this most likely means the fix will > >> end up in 7u12. If there's a strong justification for 7u10 inclusion, > >> let me know and one of the jdk7u maintainers can help you work through a > >> phase2 request[1] for 7u10. > >> > >> I'll create a bug record to track this fix in jdk7u. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Sean. > >> > >> [1] http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/phase2/phase2-process.html > >> > >> On 14/09/2012 09:55, Sean Chou wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Here's a request of porting fix 7151427 back to JDK7, could you please > >>> help > >>> to review? > >>> > >>> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7151427 > >>> > >>> Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/2d/jdk/rev/b1af41b86f9f > >>> > >>> Thread where it was reviewed: > >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2012-March/002403.html > >>> * > >>> * > >>> > > > -- Unless stated above: IBM email: neil_richards at uk.ibm.com IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
