On 14/10/2013 12:20, Alan Bateman wrote:
Vote: Veto
+1

-Chris.

The guidelines suggest at least 8 significant contributions but some of
the changes cited in the nomination don't appear (at least on the
surface) to be significant. For example, one of the changes is a
one-line fix, another is a two-line update to a properties file, another
is the addition of a method with two lines of implementation. In no way
is this veto meant to be any reflection of the good work that Mikhail is
doing, he's really just that the nomination is a bit premature.

-Alan.

Reply via email to