Hello Alan
On 14/10/2013 23:19, alexander potochkin wrote:
I kindly ask you to revise you veto and support Mikhail
I'm sorry, but I cannot support this nomination at this time.
I am also sorry to hear that
I completely agree that it can take a huge effort to arrive at a
one-line fix, we've all been there. It's just that the totality of the
changes cited in support of this nomination are not (in my view)
sufficient to justify committer role at this time.
I have no doubt that Mikhail is going great work and I would be happy
to support a future nomination once he has built up more significant
contributions to the project.
Could you please share your definition of a "significant contribution"?
I still have an impression that it is somehow related to the number of
changed lines
and fixes in regression tests are not a valid contribution in your opinion.
Is it the case?
Thanks
alexp
-Alan.
