Hi Dalibor, why do we need to remove these repositories? Are we really that short of disk space?
I don't have any concrete use case for keeping the mentioned forests but sometimes it may come in handy to browse the history of old releases. If I remember right I used jdk7u-osx several times during our PPC/AIX port. That's also the reason I'd like to keep our old PPC/AIX integration forests although they are read-only. They contain other change sets and comments compared to the changes which were finally integrated into the main repositories. So if there are no strong arguments for deleting them I'd prefer to keep them:) Regards, Volker On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 6:21 PM, dalibor topic <dalibor.to...@oracle.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I’d like to ask the ops to remove the following READ-ONLY “-dev” forests > from hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7u/ for JDK 7u releases that > have been completed: > > jdk7u2-dev > jdk7u4-dev > jdk7u40-dev > jdk7u6-dev > jdk7u60-dev > > And the old OS X port integration forest: > > jdk7u-osx > > Please let me know if you have a reason for these forests to stay around > until Friday, June 27th. > > cheers, > dalibor topic > -- > <http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager > Phone: +494089091214 <tel:+494089091214> | Mobile: +491737185961 > <tel:+491737185961> > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg > > ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG > Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München > Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603 > Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz > > Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V. > Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande > Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697 > Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher > > <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing > practices and products that help protect the environment
