On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 19:09, Brian Topping wrote: > I'm also a bit concerned about the groupId WRT to it's name in the > listing for ibiblio. I believe 'jdo' is a bit too generic, and does > nothing to distinguish the apache JDO from other implementations as it > should. > > I would suggest 'apache-jdo' at the very minimum for this. Any > objections or better suggestions?
Depends which project's groupId you're referring to here. Apache JDO encompasses many things. The "jdo.jar" is a generic interface (under "api20"). It should be under "jdo" IMHO. It isn't an implementation. It's the definitive interface for that technology -- Andy Java Persistent Objects JDO - JPOX
