Indeed, I think I said "implementation".
:b
Andy Jefferson wrote:
On Thursday 14 Apr 2005 19:09, Brian Topping wrote:
I'm also a bit concerned about the groupId WRT to it's name in the listing for ibiblio. I believe 'jdo' is a bit too generic, and does nothing to distinguish the apache JDO from other implementations as it should.
I would suggest 'apache-jdo' at the very minimum for this. Any
objections or better suggestions?
Depends which project's groupId you're referring to here. Apache JDO encompasses many things. The "jdo.jar" is a generic interface (under "api20"). It should be under "jdo" IMHO. It isn't an implementation. It's the definitive interface for that technology
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
