+1 to proposal with Andy's comments Quoting Andy Jefferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Craig, > > > This proposal would allow more specific field type to be specified at > > deployment time compared to compile time. For example, a field of > > type Object could be specified in the jdo metadata as containing only > > instances of type SimpleClass. > > I don't read the proposal as saying that the user should specify the type(s) > as comma-separated if they want a field declared as Object to store class A > or class B or class C. What does the user do when they have a field declared > as Object and want to do this ? > > > -- > Andy >
