Ok thanks. Do you think it should be considered for JDO 2.1 or 3? I can raise a JIRA feature request, so it might be easier to keep track later. Erik Bengtson -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 23, 2005 11:16 PM To: JDO Expert Group; Apache JDO project Subject: Re: failover Hi Erik, I'm afraid I don't have the energy to take on this addition to the spec, but I'd encourage you to see if you can find other like-minded folks to make a standard set of connection properties for failover. You can start a wiki page on the apache jdo site. You can use org.apache.jdo.options.failover as a prefix for the property names if they are discussed and agreed by the apache jdo project. Does this give you enough direction on a strategy for standardizing the names? Regards, Craig On Dec 23, 2005, at 6:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, The standard allows setting up one data source per PMF. Failover mechanism to recover from like "cannot obtain a connection" or "broken connections" are not covered. Wouldn't be beneficial to cover such scenarios than upon failure will switch to a backup data source? Regards, Erik Bengtson Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
