Hi Dan,

You are right; I'll stage a release of the TCK and call for another vote once folks can see what they are voting on.

Thanks,

Craig

On Jan 18, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

Thomas Fischer wrote:

Craig,

Thanks very much for your answer, that sounds very good.

Concerning the vote: As I understand you plan to make the release only
available in your home directory at apache, you do not need any approval
from the PMC for this. (You only need it if you put sumething in a
mirrored directory, such as www.apache.org/dist). Anyway, I do think
that the proposal to release a beta version makes sense, so

If it's a release from Craig's home directory then isn't it just a build
provided by Craig, it's not a Release of the JDO project.

I guess I'm still confused as to what this vote is about, no vote is
needed for Craig to produce a set of jars etc. on his home directory.

I don't think a vote is needed to start a release process either, all
that is needed is a release manager willing to do a release.

I'm just worried that people might be thinking that by voting +1 here it
means that there will be a JDO beta release without any further votes. A
vote is required on the actual distribution for an Apache release of JDO.

Or am I totally off base here.

Dan.




Craig Russell

Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo

408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to