[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-311?page=comments#action_12368259 ]
Michael Watzek commented on JDO-311: ------------------------------------ I agree with 1. above. The removal of the package prefix in 2. above is consistent with other TCK test cases: All calls of method "printUnsupportedOptionalFeatureNotTested" in TCK test classes pass a non-qualified classnames. For this reason, I propose to pass a non-qualified classname here either, or to adapt the calls in other TCK test cases as well. Please let me know how to proceed. > Inheritance3 : should check if the JDO implementation supports > "javax.jdo.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable" > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JDO-311 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-311 > Project: JDO > Type: Bug > Components: tck20 > Versions: JDO 2 beta > Reporter: Andy Jefferson > Assignee: Michael Watzek > Fix For: JDO 2 final > Attachments: JDO-311.patch > > The inheritance3 test should check whether PMF.supportedOptions contains > "javax.jdo.option.mapping.RelationSubclassTable" before running the test. > JPOX doesn't support this option yet the test still runs (and fails) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
