[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-299?page=all ]
Martin Zaun updated JDO-299:
----------------------------
Attachment: api20_defs.txt
attached is an updated version of the API signature descriptor file.
> FetchPlan should verify the values of the static fields.
I updated the descriptor file for these constant field values:
public interface javax.jdo.FetchPlan:
public static final String DEFAULT = "default";
public static final String ALL = "all";
public static final int DETACH_UNLOAD_FIELDS = 2;
public static final int DETACH_LOAD_FIELDS = 1;
public static final int FETCH_SIZE_GREEDY = -1;
public static final int FETCH_SIZE_OPTIMAL = 0;
public class javax.jdo.listener.InstanceLifecycleEvent:
public static final int CREATE = 0;
public static final int LOAD = 1;
public static final int STORE = 2;
public static final int CLEAR = 3;
public static final int DELETE = 4;
public static final int DIRTY = 5;
public static final int DETACH = 6;
public static final int ATTACH = 7;
public interface javax.jdo.Query:
public static final String JDOQL = "javax.jdo.query.JDOQL";
public static final String SQL = "javax.jdo.query.SQL";
public interface javax.jdo.spi.PersistenceCapable:
public static final byte READ_WRITE_OK = 0;
public static final byte LOAD_REQUIRED = 1;
public static final byte READ_OK = -1;
public static final byte CHECK_READ = 1;
public static final byte MEDIATE_READ = 2;
public static final byte CHECK_WRITE = 4;
public static final byte MEDIATE_WRITE = 8;
public static final byte SERIALIZABLE = 16;
There are 4 public static fields in JDOPermission for which I cannot (easily)
add constant definitions (not literals). But perhaps they don't belong into
the descriptor file anyway (they're not mentioned in the spec):
public final class javax.jdo.spi.JDOPermission:
public static final javax.jdo.spi.JDOPermission GET_METADATA;
public static final javax.jdo.spi.JDOPermission MANAGE_METADATA;
public static final javax.jdo.spi.JDOPermission SET_STATE_MANAGER;
public static final javax.jdo.spi.JDOPermission
CLOSE_PERSISTENCE_MANAGER_FACTORY;
> Do you intend to test the "implements" clause of the interfaces?
I'm testing the 'extends' clause for interfaces (they cannot have 'implements',
which is also tested).
> In general, I think we should not verify protected or private methods.
I've removed all protected declarations from the descriptor file.
> Reviewed up to but not including InstanceCallbacks.
Thx, so far.
> Signature test needed checking compliance of implementations with JDO2.0 API
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-299
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-299
> Project: JDO
> Type: Task
> Components: tck20
> Reporter: Martin Zaun
> Assignee: Martin Zaun
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: JDO 2 final
> Attachments: api20_defs.txt
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
