Hi Craig, > Given that we had fieldType and fieldTypes in @Field and @Property, > and type and types in @Element, @Key, and @Value, I made them > consistent by changing types to boundTypes in @Element, @Key, and > @Value. > > Is this what we want? Or should we change boundTypes back to types > for all four annotation types?
"boundTypes" does absolutely nothing for me. I don't see what is wrong with "types" and "fieldTypes", and that is, after all, what the XML has. -- Andy (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)
