Hi Craig,
Michelle volunteered to take a look. I think setting the field-type is
not necessary, because the declared Java type is Address, a PC class and
not an interface. It is ok to specify the field-type, but it might be
confusing since it is not necessary. So I propose to remove it.
Regards Michael
To your field-type issue, I'll take a look at this later. Do you think
it's causing issues?
Craig
On Jul 27, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:
Hi Craig,
Looking briefly, it looks like the only cases are for the embedded
Address field. Is this what you are referring to?
That's the one I spotted and didn't look further.
PS. "api2" seems to be missing a couple of files being checked in for a
working build
test/java/javax/jdo/annotations/TestEmbeddedSet.java
test/java/javax/jdo/annotations/TestEmbeddedMap.java
- change the "embedded" to "embeddedMapping".
--
Andy (Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineering GmbH Tel.: +49/(0)30/235 520-33
Buelowstr. 66 Fax.: +49/(0)30/217 520-12
10783 Berlin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Anna-Kristin Proefrock
Sitz Berlin, Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 564 52
