Yes, this occurred to me last night. Are we looking at jdo3-api-3.0, or jdo2-api-3.0?
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Andy Jefferson <[email protected]> wrote: >> To me, this justifies renaming the release from JDO 2.3 to JDO 3.0. > > One minor issue with the rename is that the Maven repo has the artifact as > "jdo2-api". Do we go forward with this same name and just set the version to > 3.0, or does it become an artifact of "jdo-api" ? > > > -- > Andy > DataNucleus (http://www.datanucleus.org) > -- mailto:[email protected] skype:matthewadams12 yahoo:matthewadams aol:matthewadams12 google-talk:[email protected] msn:[email protected] http://matthewadams.me http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthewadams
