+1 Release JDO.next specification +1 Rename JDO.next to JDO 3.0. +1 Rename maven artifact from jdo2-api to jdo-api
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Craig L Russell <[email protected]> wrote: > I've looked at the changes for JDO 2.3 and I agree with others that the > changes are pretty significant in terms of new capabilities for tools and > users. > > Added an Enhancer API to allow applications to dynamically enhance classes. > Added a Metadata API to allow applications to query and create metadata for > classes. > Modified the behavior of getObjectById to allow the application to specify > the exact class of an instance, thereby avoiding a database access to > instantiate a persistent instance with a specific identity. > Added a datastore timeout that will cancel datastore operations that exceed > a user-specified time limit. > Added a query cancel that allows applications to cancel currently-executing > queries. > > The Enhancer API enables tools to be developed that support plugins for ant, > Eclipse, Netbeans, and other Java IDEs and tools to allow users to enhance > their classes during build, packaging, or runtime, without use of > proprietary APIs. > > The Metadata API enables tools to be developed to dynamically create Java > classes that map to existing SQL and NoSQL datastores and dynamically > specify the metadata for the mapping, without use of proprietary APIs. > > To me, this justifies renaming the release from JDO 2.3 to JDO 3.0. > > I'd like to run two votes simultaneously: > > Release JDO.next specification (the vote on the release artifacts will > follow shortly; there are still a small number of issues to resolve) > > Rename JDO.next to JDO 3.0. > > Please vote early and often. The last vote recorded for any person will > determine that person's vote. Polls are open now and will close no earlier > than May 6. > > Thanks, > > Craig > > On Apr 8, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Craig L Russell wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We're almost done with 2.3. Please take a look and see if there are any >> changes needed before we vote. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Craig >> >> For those only on the apache alias, please find the specification at: > >> http://people.apache.org/~clr/jdo-2010-04-09.pdf > > Craig >> >> Craig L Russell >> Architect, Oracle >> http://db.apache.org/jdo >> 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected] >> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >> > > Craig L Russell > Architect, Oracle > http://db.apache.org/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:[email protected] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! > >
