Hi,

since we want to support JRE 1.8+ I should probably create a new RC5
with the dependencies that Andy provided.

If nobody objects I will set up a new RC tomorrow.

Best,
Til


On 27/11/2021 17:05, Craig Russell wrote:
Hi Andy,

Thanks for helping us get the best possible list of DataNucleus dependencies 
for the release.

Thanks for clarifying the purpose of the api-jdo jar. I had a misunderstanding 
of what the datanucleus-api-jdo was, having never actually looked at it. I 
should have asked the question instead of suggesting that it be removed. My bad.

It will help greatly if you could also look at the release artifacts that 
Tilmann sent a link to.

Warm regards,
Craig

On Nov 27, 2021, at 5:53 AM, Andy Jefferson <a...@datanucleus.org> wrote:

1. JDO 3.2 release RC4
The release includes DataNucleus reference in the pom: core 5.2.7;
rdbms 5.2.7; api-jdo 5.2.7; jdo-query 5.0.9; api-jpa 5.2.6.
Are these the right DataNucleus versions for the 3.2 release?
We probably should remove the datanucleus api-jdo and instead use the official
3.2 api.

If you intend JDO 3.2 to be for JRE 1.8+ then you need the LATEST in the v5.x
series
datanucleus-core 5.2.9
datanucleus-api-jdo 5.2.7
datanucleus-api-jpa 5.2.8
datanucleus-rdbms 5.2.9
datanucleus-jdo-query 5.0.9

Removing datanucleus-api-jdo will make your life much harder since then you
will be testing DataNucleus with NO SUPPORT for the JDO API. That is the DN
API-support jar, not the API interfaces. Just like the associated datanucleus-
api-jpa jar provides SUPPORT for the JPA API.



Regards
--
Andy
DataNucleus (Web: http://www.datanucleus.org   Twitter: @datanucleus)


Craig L Russell
c...@apache.org

Reply via email to