Hi, > On Nov 27, 2021, at 10:34 AM, Michael Bouschen <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I think you propose remove the two pdf files 3.1 and 3.1-rc1 from the > distribution and keep them in the git repository, correct? I agree to remove > them from the distribution.
That's it. Since the .pdf file can be created trivially using OpenOffice it really doesn't need to be part of the source distribution. > > I also agree creating a new rc5 with the datanucleus dependencies that Andy > provided. I will still not wait for this before contacting JCP with the rc4 artifacts that we have already. Regards Craig > > Regards Michael > >> Hi Til, >> >> Just one lil thing that I noticed. >> >> The specification/OOO directory has two pdf files: 3.1 and 3.1-rc1. We >> should probably just remove these since it is a source release. I'll >> generate a 3.2.pdf for the JCP but I really think we don't need the pdf for >> the release. >> >> Thanks, >> Craig >> >>> On Nov 27, 2021, at 9:11 AM, Tilmann <tilmann_...@gmx.de> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> since we want to support JRE 1.8+ I should probably create a new RC5 >>> with the dependencies that Andy provided. >>> >>> If nobody objects I will set up a new RC tomorrow. >>> >>> Best, >>> Til >>> >>> >>> On 27/11/2021 17:05, Craig Russell wrote: >>>> Hi Andy, >>>> >>>> Thanks for helping us get the best possible list of DataNucleus >>>> dependencies for the release. >>>> >>>> Thanks for clarifying the purpose of the api-jdo jar. I had a >>>> misunderstanding of what the datanucleus-api-jdo was, having never >>>> actually looked at it. I should have asked the question instead of >>>> suggesting that it be removed. My bad. >>>> >>>> It will help greatly if you could also look at the release artifacts that >>>> Tilmann sent a link to. >>>> >>>> Warm regards, >>>> Craig >>>> >>>>> On Nov 27, 2021, at 5:53 AM, Andy Jefferson <a...@datanucleus.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 1. JDO 3.2 release RC4 >>>>>> The release includes DataNucleus reference in the pom: core 5.2.7; >>>>>> rdbms 5.2.7; api-jdo 5.2.7; jdo-query 5.0.9; api-jpa 5.2.6. >>>>>> Are these the right DataNucleus versions for the 3.2 release? >>>>>> We probably should remove the datanucleus api-jdo and instead use the >>>>>> official >>>>> 3.2 api. >>>>> >>>>> If you intend JDO 3.2 to be for JRE 1.8+ then you need the LATEST in the >>>>> v5.x >>>>> series >>>>> datanucleus-core 5.2.9 >>>>> datanucleus-api-jdo 5.2.7 >>>>> datanucleus-api-jpa 5.2.8 >>>>> datanucleus-rdbms 5.2.9 >>>>> datanucleus-jdo-query 5.0.9 >>>>> >>>>> Removing datanucleus-api-jdo will make your life much harder since then >>>>> you >>>>> will be testing DataNucleus with NO SUPPORT for the JDO API. That is the >>>>> DN >>>>> API-support jar, not the API interfaces. Just like the associated >>>>> datanucleus- >>>>> api-jpa jar provides SUPPORT for the JPA API. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> -- >>>>> Andy >>>>> DataNucleus (Web: http://www.datanucleus.org Twitter: @datanucleus) >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Craig L Russell >>>> c...@apache.org >>>> >> Craig L Russell >> c...@apache.org >> > Craig L Russell c...@apache.org
