well, dunno how that happened. the jdo meeting is in progress with just me > On Mar 1, 2023, at 12:07, Tilmann Zäschke <tilma...@apache.org> wrote: > > I am getting "the host has another meeting in progress" ...? > > > On 01/03/2023 18:57, Tobias Bouschen wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> sorry for the short notice again, but I won't be able to attend today's >> conference call. I will see you all next week. >> >> Best regards, >> Tobias >> >> On 28/02/2023 20:58, Michael Bouschen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> We will have our regular meeting Wednesday March 1 12:00 Pacific Standard >>> Time (PST) 21:00 Central European Time (CET) to discuss JDO TCK issues and >>> status. >>> >>> We use the following dial-in for audio and video: >>> https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87074698575?pwd=bmZXeVV3dVowRHFDWk9KWFdVWjc3dz09 >>> >>> Agenda: >>> >>> 1. JIRA JDO-819 "Code quality analysis" >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-819 >>> JIRA JDO-823 "Fix sonarcloud issues of type Code Smells" >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-823 >>> >>> Sonarcloud link: https://sonarcloud.io/summary/overall?id=db-jdo >>> >>> * Try-catch blocks should not be nested: >>> https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS1141&severities=MAJOR&id=db-jdo >>> >>> * Utility classes should not habe public constructors: >>> https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS1118&severities=MAJOR&id=db-jdo >>> >>> * Sections of code should not be commented out: >>> https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS125&severities=MAJOR&id=db-jdo >>> >>> * Throwable and Error shoudl not be caught: >>> https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS1181&severities=MAJOR&id=db-jdo >>> >>> * Constructors of an abstract" class should not be declared "public": >>> https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS5993&severities=MAJOR&id=db-jdo >>> >>> * Cognitive Complexity of methods should not be too high: >>> https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS3776&severities=CRITICAL&types=CODE_SMELL&id=db-jdo >>> >>> * Raw types should not be used: >>> https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?resolved=false&rules=java%3AS3740&severities=MAJOR&id=db-jdo >>> >>> >>> 2. JIRA JDO-709 "Standardize field/property converters" >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-709 >>> >>> 3. JIRA JDO-822: "Verify compatibility with JDK 20" >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-822 >>> >>> 4. JIRA JDO-812 "Move to JDK 11 as the lowest supported version" >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-812 >>> >>> 5. Other issues >>> >>> Action Items from weeks past: >>> >>> [Nov 23 2022] AI Tilmann follow up with Andy/DataNucleus for his advice on >>> JDO-709. >>> [Oct 20 2022] AI Craig update the JIRA JDO-709 to request a test case using >>> annotations and results of the test. >>> [Dec 09 2021] AI Craig: Try to contact all current/former participants in >>> JDO development and see if and how they want to be recognized on the JDO >>> and DB web sites.https://db.apache.org/whoweare.html >>> [Oct 07 2021] AI Craig send a private message to all JSR-243 Expert Group >>> members asking if they wish to continue. >>> [Mar 25 2021] AI Craig: investigate "merging" papajdo and apache.clr >>> accounts >>> [Oct 17 2014] AI Matthew any updates for "Modify specification to address >>> NoSQL datastores" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651 >>>
Craig L Russell c...@apache.org
