On 14/12/10 20:51, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 14/12/2010 20:05, Andy Seaborne wrote:
== svn
Committer access: I haven't heard anything.
Ross -
Are we in a starvation deadlock here on the missing iCLA from Jeremy?
Accounts have been requested for those who have registered iCLAs on file.
We have to wait for root@ to create them, this is a human process and
can sometimes take a while - there are various security checks to be
carried out etc.
I've just sent a gentle reminder to infra@ but we have to be patient I'm
afraid (this is the last bloker apart from CCLA)
No problem - I was just checking we weren't in an "A waiting for B
waiting for A" situation. I realise these things can take a while and
there has been a burst of projects.
== CLAs
ICLAs:
Jeremy - you are not listed at
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
Everyone else is now listed as unlisted CLAs section.
If anyone has not been copied on a mail from me to [email protected] requesting
their accounts please let me know as that is an oversight.
I didn't receive anything but given the necessary aggressiveness of spam
filters these days, that doesn't mean you didn't send it.
== legal
HP: legal person identified, waiting to get into detailed discussions
My understanding was that this had been completed before the proposal
was submitted. Is that not the case?
We have discussed this with HP and it was Ok in principle - but until
there was a definite action to be taken, then it's only "in principle".
We now have that definite step to take. I hope it'll be straightforward
as the material in question has been available via a BSD-class license
in an agreed open source project.
Andy
Ross
