On 14/12/10 23:15, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 14/12/2010 22:53, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 14/12/10 20:51, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 14/12/2010 20:05, Andy Seaborne wrote:
...
== CLAs
ICLAs:
Jeremy - you are not listed at
http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html#unlistedclas
Everyone else is now listed as unlisted CLAs section.
If anyone has not been copied on a mail from me to [email protected] requesting
their accounts please let me know as that is an oversight.
I didn't receive anything but given the necessary aggressiveness of spam
filters these days, that doesn't mean you didn't send it.
I just resent yours to you, all these mails were also cc'd the private
list.
Received, thanks.
== legal
HP: legal person identified, waiting to get into detailed discussions
My understanding was that this had been completed before the proposal
was submitted. Is that not the case?
We have discussed this with HP and it was Ok in principle - but until
there was a definite action to be taken, then it's only "in principle".
Hmmmm.... I was under the impression it was a little more concrete than
that. but I understand.
We now have that definite step to take. I hope it'll be straightforward
as the material in question has been available via a BSD-class license
in an agreed open source project.
The big difference between the BSD and the Apache License is the patent
handling.
Indeed. Separately, we have had to assess the patent situation for Jena
(e.g. ARQ for W3C work).
Please let me know if I can help make this happen.
Ross
Andy
